There are two types of novels, the reproductive and the
perverse.
Reproductive novels are analogous to missionary-position
intercourse engaged in for the purpose of producing offspring.
Perverse novels are like tied-up face-down ball-gag
ass-slappin’ doggie-style Greco-Roman three-way pinkie-frottage for the
purposelessness of continual shatterings.
Reproductive novels change diapers, perverse novels wear
them for fun.
In reproductive novels there are characters, and in the
course of the novel they have an epiphany, which assures them that they have a
soul.
In perverse novels there are figures. They have anti-epiphanies or no epiphanies at
all, which assures them that they might be trompe l’oeil.
Reproductive novels are moral, perverse novels revalue
values.
Reality is the scab that forms over arrested and brutalized
vitality. The reproductive novel is the
band-aid laid over the scab. The
perverse novel tears off the band-aid with its teeth, scratches the scab away,
worries the wound.
Reproductive novels have closure, perverse novels are
open-ended: legs crossed vs. ass in the air.
Reproductive novels contribute, in the small way
that novels can contribute to anything, to the reproduction of society at the
level of the status quo.
Perverse novels are on a strike that is impossible to tell
from a jubilee.
The reproductive novel always speaks in the name of the
highest ideals, even – or rather especially – when these are embedded in the
homiest of domestic scenes.
The perverse novel is trivial where the reproductive novel
is important, anorectic where it is bloated, and chastened where it is proud.
The reproductive novel is original in unimportant ways, the
perverse novel derivative in significant ones.
Reproductive novels lay a wreath at the tomb of their
ancestors, perverse novels wear the dress their grandmother was buried in to a
banquet of their granddaddy’s balls.
There is a reproductive novel on your nightstand. There is a perverse novel under the mattress
on your lover’s side of the bed.
Beware of faux-perverse novels, always looking over their
shoulders to make sure the outraged reproductive novel is not far behind. (This is often known as “the underground”).
There are reproductive novels which take on a little
perversity as inoculation; yesterday’s perversions can become today’s rote
reproductive foreplay. (This is often
known as “style”).
Don’t jump to conclusions: there are subtly perverse novels in reproductive-novel drag.
In the reproductive novel you can see yourself, in the
perverse novel you feel like a stranger to yourself.
Reproductive novels say, “I am a novel.” Perverse novels ask, “What is a novel?”
Glance at your watch after reading a reproductive novel,
sniff your fingers after reading a perverse novel.
A whole department of the critical-academic-industrial
complex is devoted to reading perverse novels reproductively.
Reproductive novels should be read perversely – or not at
all.
4 comments:
Some particulars/examples might be helpful.
Haha! This is so great!
Hi Jim H. The reproductive novel serves to reproduce the status-quo. One specific function of literary function is to induce readers to conclude that experiencing deep, powerful feelings about social injustice is a sufficient marker of their humanity, thus reducing the need to actually try to change the world.
The perverse novel does not allow readers the self-satsisfaction of the reproductive novel.
If this makes sense, I'd be interested to see the examples of these approaches that make sense to you.
"Perverse novels are like tied-up face-down ball-gag ass-slappin’ doggie-style Greco-Roman three-way pinkie-frottage for the purposelessness of continual shatterings."
That's always my favorite aisle in the library!
Post a Comment